Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mandy Hoblin's avatar

I have thought about this blog post many times since I first read it in August. Jackson, thank you for your thoughtful, biblically based teaching about divorce. This is not an easy subject. I had the shameful, alone feelings that my divorce brought me. I felt like a failure but I didn't share it with anyone other than my sister and brother-in-law, Believers in Christ who held me, cried with me and led me in God's word. God didn't make me feel that, I did, and it took time and God's word to help me through it. This blog, your words, brought me even more understanding and clarity, about divorce. Thank you for taking on the subject, being obedient to God and teaching!

Expand full comment
Paul's avatar

Interesting. The view I grew being taught was that Jesus was not invalidating Moses, but teaching a moral truth that they simply didn't understand within the law of Moses. IE that divorce except in the case of sexual immorality is sinful.

This reading is much more logically simple. If I understand it correctly. Remarriage while your former spouse is alive is adultery and unless there was already adultery whoever divorces is causing it. If adultery already happened then the person that was already unfaithful has caused the adultery.

This view deals much cleaner with the issue of divorce due to other types of breaking the marriage covenant by demonstrating that the clause, except in the case of sexual immorality, is there not because of sexual immoralities rank in reasons for divorce (though it is of course quite high on any list reasonable justifications for divorce), but it was necessary because of the logical definition of adultery.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts